Category Archives: astrophotography

Location: at home in Tomball, TX
Cloud cover: 0%Transparency: average (3/5)
Seeing: poor (2/5)
Darkness: no moon, city glow
Wind: breezy 10-15 mph
Temperature: 70-75
Humidity: 52% up to 64%
Dew Point: 50-60
Time: 8:30 pm – 10:30 pm CDT
OTA: 8″ SC

Used Live cam to image Cor Caroli (DBL) and Saturn. Live cam does not appear to have as much clarity as the NexImage; images are fuzzier. Still post-processing image data for publishing.

Cor Caroli

Cor Caroli taken with Creative Live Cam through Celstron 8" SCT under poor seeing conditions. 91 total frames aligned and stacked.

Also observed Saturn visually. Titan, Rhea, and Dione formed a nearly equilateral triangle off one limb of the rings, Tethys orbited outside the other limb. Iapetus still at relatively small separation from Saturn.

Saturn and five of its moons

Saturn and five of its moons taken with Creative Live Cam through Celstron 8" SCT under poor seeing conditions. Two separate exposure settings for Saturn and for its moons. 253 total frames, aligned, stacked, and heavily processed.

M40 DBL in UMa faint and unremarkable, approximately equal magnitudes.

M85 GAL in Com appeared as a very faint fuzzy.

Algorab DBL in Cor – easy split, guessed delta mag 4 or 5. SNP lists Algorab as 2.9, doesn’t show companion or even indicate Algorab is a double.

24 Com – yellow primary, blue secondary. Guessed magnitudes 4 and 5, SNP lists them as 5.0 and 6.6, but online reference listed them as 5.2 and 6.5. In fact, I’ve noticed that researching star magnitudes online there is a lot of variability inthe magnitudes reported for most stars. Not sure what to make of that yet.

Location: at home in Tomball, TX
Cloud cover: none
Transparency: above average (4/5)
Seeing: poor (2/5)
Darkness: no moon, city glow
Wind: none
Humidity: 75%
Temperature: 60° F
Start Time: 10:30 pm CDT
End Time: 11:00 pm CDT
OTA: 8″ SC

The Celestron NexImage camera has stopped working. I emailed Celestron customer support, but they have not contacted me, so here I have clear skies and no camera.

I recently found a webcam capture utility for Linux called webstream and decided to try it with the Creative Live web cam I bought on clearance last year. The goal for the evening was just to step through an entire cycle of image capture and stacking to verify that it could be done.

When I first tried using the Creative Live cam last year the I was disappointed and frustrated because the Windows driver would BSOD within a minute or so of operation. I tried it in three different machines with the same result. I hoped the linux driver might work better, and it did. Installing the driver, however, was no picnic. In fact, just locating the driver was no picnic. The camera model was not supported by the standard gspca and uvc linux webcam drivers. After more than an hour of googling I found driver source code, built it, and the world was happy (well, in any case the camera owner was happy). I captured a quick picture from my desktop just to verify that it was waorking correctly with camstream. The first step was successful, but how would it do as a cheap astrophotography camera?

Before mounting the camera to the telescope I removed the tiny webcam lens. It unscrewed easily. I assume that like many webcams the lens had an IR filter, which means that star images captured without the filter will appear brighter than in visible light. Next I used a rubber band to wrap the webcam’s round plastic cover. With the rubber band in place, the camera fit snugly into an old 1.25″ barrel I recycled from one of those useless 4mm eyepieces bundled with a starter scope. Now I was ready to mount it in the telescope!

I set up the scope on the driveway and aimed at Polaris. All the camera adjustments (gamma, brightness, saturation, etc.) were set in the “middle” of the slider range. There are no numeric indicators or fine controls in camstream, so I could only estimate. After the camera was configured I could see Polaris as a bright, flickering disk and I could almost make out Polaris’ brighter companion on screen. I was disappointed that camstream had no shutter speed control, nor could it capture images faster than one per second. I grabbed a few dozen images and shut everything down. The second step was successful, so far so good.

Next I copied the images up to my desktop and opened them with Registax. I recently upgraded to a newer version and I spent a few minutes learning to navigate the new interface. For some reason object tracking was not selected by default. Anyway, it stacked the frames and eliminated the noise. Unfortunately Polaris’ secondary was too dim for Registax to pick it out from the noise. Polaris itself looked a little distorted, but the seeing was poor and the star is only 30° altitude, so I didn’t expect much. As far as I was concerned, the third step and the entire night was a success.

So how does the Creative Live cam compare to the NexImage? Well, they both have a resolution of 640×480, so no big difference there. The sensitivity seems pretty comparable. Last year I imaged the Trapezium with the NexImage and θ1b Orionis (at mag 8.0-8.5) was just barely visible. Various sources list Polaris B between mag 8 and 9, slightly dimmer than θ1b Orionis. The Live cam was able to pick up Polaris B, but at the noise level. The cost difference is pretty big: you can get the Creative Live cam for about $16, but the NexImage is $100. The only advantage I see to the NexImage is that it was designed with the hardware to fit into the 1.25″ focuser. Windows users may have trouble with the driver crashing; I certainly did.

Here’s an idea: maybe the Live cam board will fit inside the NexImage case, then I could use the camera that works in a case that fits the focuser. I’ll have to give that a try.

Location: Tomball, TX
Cloud cover: none
Transparency: good (4/5)
Seeing: good (4/5)
Darkness: city sky glow, waxing crescent moon
Limiting Magnitude: n/a
Wind: mild/none
Humidity: 75% early up to 85% later
Temperature: mid-40’s
Start Time: 8:30 pm CST
End Time: 10:30 pm CST
OTA: 8″ SC

Used additional calibration star during setup, goto was very good.

Tonight the Celestron NexImage camera worked, as opposed to last night’s useless performance. Only major change that I’m aware of was that this time I ran the camera indoors until the scope was set up. Last time I set everything outside, including the camera. Maybe the temp of the electronics was below spec’ed operating range?

Captured several images of mars, luna (with and without focal reducer), and trapezium. Learning curve has just begun. Atmospheric turbulence easily seen in real-time video of lunar craters. Attempted to image Saturn but it was still low in the sky so I could not get good focus.

trapezium - 13 feb 2008
photo: trapezium – note line of stars left, 3rd star very faint

Observed double star Almech (gamma andromeda), easily split with 15mm. Similar magnitude, brightest with a touch of yellow, second star deep blue.

Betelgeuse yellow with orange at the fringe. Lots of scattering (as with all tonight’s observations) due to humidity.

M34 – dim open cluster in 32mm. Nearly symmetrical pattern of thirteen stars near center like a goose with wings outstretched.

Follow-up Notes

Later reference using SNP reports the dimmest of the four trapezium stars, which it calls Trapezium1B, as mag 7.46. This star is quite dim in the NexImage, although it is easily seen in any of the eyepieces. Also visible in image (but very, very faint) is mag 8.43 star TYC4774-935-1. Transparency was not perfect last night, but even so it appears the NexImage will only be useful for stars of mag 6 or brighter.

Video capture file of Mars was corrupt. Let that be a lesson: next time take multiple images.

CCD has dust on surface and lint that affects image. Needs to be cleaned.