Archives
- November 2009 (1)
- September 2009 (1)
- August 2009 (2)
- July 2009 (2)
- June 2009 (6)
- May 2009 (1)
- April 2009 (6)
- February 2009 (1)
- December 2008 (1)
- October 2008 (1)
- September 2008 (1)
- August 2008 (1)
- April 2008 (1)
- March 2008 (3)
- February 2008 (5)
- January 2008 (3)
- October 2007 (1)
- August 2007 (1)
- July 2007 (1)
- June 2007 (4)
- April 2007 (1)
- February 2007 (1)
- January 2007 (3)
- December 2006 (2)
- October 2006 (1)
- September 2006 (4)
Most Common Tags
albireo antares arcturus beta monocerotis callisto ceres clouds dione eclipse epsilon lyra eta cassiopeia europa ganymede geminids iapetus io iota cancri jupiter m3 m27 m31 m35 m42 m50 m52 m57 m103 mars mcnaught meteor shower mizar moon neptune neximage planning polaris rhea saturn spica sunset tethys titan uranus venus vestaCategories
Location: at home in Tomball, TX
Cloud cover: less than 5%
Transparency: average (3/5)
Seeing: avg (3/5) or sometimes slightly better
Darkness: no moon, city glow
Wind: almost none
Temperature: 76º-82º
Humidity: 57%-67%
Dew Point: 65º
Time: 10:00 pm – 12:30 am CDT
OTA: 8″ SCT
Guidescope: 70mm refractor
First light with guidescope. Very disappointed to discover PHD Guiding software did not recognize the NexImage and it claimed my scope did not support pulse mode. Fiddled with it longer than I should have. Bottom line: zero success.
Guidescope was very useful for making fine adjustments while D50 was attached to the main scope. Best practice using laptop to view real-time output from NexImage in the guidescope, but eyepiece use works ok, too.
Tried to image Jupiter, photos were awfully blurry. First image seemed to show moon touching jupiter’s limb, no other moons. Tried again with ep. No moons visible, black spot visible at edge. Re-installed D50, tried to re-focus, star image was an irregularly shaped streak even with relatively short exposure times less than 1/10 second. I suspect vibration from the shutter, but it was late and I was tired of trying to debug it.
Finally reverted to visual observation. By this time two distinct black spots were visible. I thought I was seeing a double eclipse, but later cross-ref with SNP and SkyViewCafe indicated one spot was the shadow of Europa and the other Ganymede itself. In the illustration below, the top spot is the shadow of Europa and the bottom spot is Ganymede.
Location: at home in Tomball, TX
Cloud cover: less than 5%
Transparency: average (3/5)
Seeing: below avg (4/5)
Darkness: no moon, city glow
Wind: almost none (see below)
Temperature: 70º-72º
Humidity: 95%+
Dew Point: 69º+
Time: 10:45 pm – 12:15 am CDT
OTA: 8″ SC
First light using Starry Night Pro to control the telescope via serial cable. I have an old version of SNP (4.5) and there are a few minor user interface quirks, but generally I was pleased with the operation. Also first light using DIYPhotoBits to control the Nikon D50 via USB. I was very pleased with the results. I’ve actually modded DIYPB to display images after download using IrfanView, making it much easier to center and check focus.
I started with M57, the Ring Nebula. Exposures above 10 seconds exhibited elongation. It didn’t occur to me until later to use DIYPB’s time lapse feature to collect a set of images for stacking, so I only captured two at that speed. M57 is hardly visible at only 10 seconds, even using ISO1600, so there’s not much to see there.
Next I captured photos of Jupiter and the Galilean moons. Due to the bad seeing and the humidity the image quality was quite poor. The two main bands were visible but murky and the entire image seemed slightly out of focus. I rechecked the focus with the Hartman mask and that was not the problem. The composite photo below shows the relative positions of the planet and its four moons. Io and Europa (on the left) passed in conjunction over the next couple of hours, but it was already late and I didn’t want to stay up for it.
Last I photographed M52, an open star cluster in the constellation Cassiopeia. As earlier with M57, I was unable to get an exposure longer than 10 seconds without elongation. It occurred to me then to use DIYPB’s time lapse feature to take several photos (10, actually) in quick succession then try to stack and merge them later. I tried stacking with RegiStax5, but I was not pleased with the results: the stars looked dull and washed out. I stacked the frames by hand and the result was much better.
This image shows far fewer stars than you might see in a typical photo of M52. This view is representative of what you might see in an amateur telescope. You mileage will vary depending on your telescope and sky conditions.
Location: at home in Tomball, TX
Cloud cover: 0%
Transparency: above average (4/5)
Seeing: est. avg (3 or 4 out of 5)
Darkness: no moon, city glow
Wind: almost none (see below)
Temperature: 80º-85º
Humidity: 70%-85%
Dew Point: 72º-75º
Time: 9:00 pm – 1:00 am CDT
OTA: 8″ SC
Began with visual observation of Jupiter. Best view I have ever seen. Two main belts easily seen, two thin faint belts also visible in steadier seeing. All four Galilean moons visible: one left and three right.
Took photos of many targets using the D50. Most images had elongated stars varied in length and direction. In a couple of photos the stars are almost doughnut-shaped with dark centers. A few photos had no elongation, even at long exposures. Magnification shows elongated shapes are often irregularly shaped. My best explanation for the elongation is wind, although I felt no wind all night with only rare light gusts. Shutter is on 5 second timer. Perhaps I will try a longer timer next time.
Photos of M103 and M31 suffered from elongation. Photos of η Cas and Albireo (shown below) came out well. M76 was barely discernible even with a 30 second exposure at ISO 1600. Cat’s Eye Nebula (NGC6543) small, vivid teal, somewhat hazy — maybe from initial dew buildup that I didn’t recognize until much later.
Also took several photos of Jupiter and its moons, none of which were very good because of (as yet undiscovered) dew on the corrector. Several photos of Neptune and Uranus showed good color but no detail.
Here’s a quick shot to the waxing gibbous moon taken just after sunset. Moon: FL 300mm, ISO 800, 1/2000 sec, f/6.

Waxing Gibbous Moon
Tonight I tried my hand at photographing a few Deep Sky Objects. The Hartman mask was extremely useful for focusing, but after tonight it’s clear that I’m going to need to control the D50 by tethering it to the laptop to get best results. Manipulating the zoom controls for the LCD is awkward at best. I may need to spend some time just practicing focusing on a few different stars.
Saturn was actually the first target before the DSOs. I captured a couple of images at ISO 800 and 4 sec exposure that included the moons Titan, Tethys, Dione, and Iapetus (Rhea was transiting and lost in Saturn’s glare). I reduced the exposure time several steps, but it was hard to see much detail in the LCD (another argument for tethered control), so I moved on.
Next I tried M13, the globular cluster in Hercules. This actually turned out to be the best subject of the night. One of the photos had some jitter from the wind shaking the telescope (did I mention it was occasionally quite breezy?). Most were fairly good, however, with nearly round stars — limited by the sharpness of the focus, most likely. Click the image to see a very large full-sized photograph. If you look closely you can see stars of several different colors in the cluster. M13: FL 2032mm, ISO 800, 30sec exposure, f/10.
Next came M57, the Ring Nebula in Lyra. I captured several images, but they all showed noticeable wind jitter. I’m certain this is telescope vibration and not tracking error because the motion vector varies from one photograph to the next. I merged the four best frames in Registax, stretched to compensate for the motion vector, applied a gamma correction to increase the brightness, then reduced the image size to improve the apparent sharpness of the focus. M57: FL 2032mm, ISO 800, 30 sec exposure, f/10.

M57 - The Ring Nebula
The next target I tried was M27, the Dumbbell nebula. However, even with a 30 sec exposure at ISO 800 there was almost no trace of any nebulosity in the photo, so I moved on.
I decided to re-balance the telescope forward to compensate for the extra weight of the camera on the back. This, of course completed wrecked the scopes alignment so I had to restart. After alignment I focused the camera on Mizar (ζ UMa). It’s a nice blue double, but it’s included here for more than aesthetic reasons. According to SNP, the separation between Mizar A and B is 14 arc-seconds. In the unprocessed photo, the distance between the centers of the stars is approximately 19.3 pixels (along a diagonal). This puts the resolution for the camera at about 0.725 arc-seconds per pixel. By comparing similar measurements of other doubles I should be able to calculate the actual resolution more accurately. Mizar: FL 2032mm, ISO 800, 1/2 sec exposure, f/10.
After rebalancing I Attempted several images of the Whirlpool galaxy M51. The cores of M51 and its companion galaxy both appeared tiny and featureless over several photographic attempts.
Tonight I got my first shot of the moon with the D50 and the C8. This was about an hour before sunset. Aiden was my big helper while I assembled the telescope. Then he stood on the stool and looked through the eyepiece at the moon.
The number of craters visible in the high-resolution image is really amazing. Central peak uplifts are visible in many of the larger craters. However, the focus was not tight enough in general to pick up the terrace edges (although you can make out traces here and there). You can click on the image below to see the full-sized photograph, but be prepared to wait! The big photo is 2.3MB at a whopping 2900×2900.
You can see some severe vignette in the corners from the 1.25″ universal T-adapter. The photo is actually a composite of two separate shots because the moon did not fit in the camera’s image sensor at this high magnification.
Telescope: Celestron C8, FL 2032mm, f/10
Camera: Nikon D50, ISO 800, 1/1000s
Update: clicking the photo should work now!
It was hot outside tonight, even for Houston in the summer. It was still 93ºF after sunset! I got this shot with the Meade refractor using ISO 200 at 1/100s. There’s just a touch of blur from me supporting one end by hand. I was tired and didn’t want to mess with pulling out the GEM tonight in the heat. Click the image to see full resolution photo.
I took this late at night between our house and the neighbor’s. There were scattered light clouds and I don’t think the sky was ever completely clear. Technical details: Nikon D50, Tamron lens @ 300mm, f/6, ISO 200, 1/200s. Click photo to enlarge.
A few days later I woke up at 5:30 with the realization that the gibbous moon would be high in the sky. I know, I know, too much time thinking about lunar orbital characteristics and not enough time thinking about… hmm… what else is there again? Anyway, you can hardly blame me: the adapter for mounting the camera to the scope had just arrived the day before. (Technically, there’s a T-Ring for the Nikon D50 mated to a universal 1.25″ T-adapter.)
Oooh. Nice craters. The photo was taken just before sunrise. Other tech stuff: 70mm Meade refractor w/ 600mm FL, f/8.57, ISO 200, 1/200s.Click photo to enlarge.
I took this last one a couple mornings later just after sunrise. This one is framed in the blurred branches of a tree. You can just make out some craters along the terminator. Tech stuff: Tamron @ 300mm, f/6, ISO 400, 1/1600s. Click photo to enlarge.















